<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Living Together Without Marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marriage.ygoy.com/index.php/living-together-without-marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marriage.ygoy.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:41:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: linda a.</title>
		<link>http://marriage.ygoy.com/living-together-without-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-1369</link>
		<dc:creator>linda a.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 13:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marriage.ygoy.com/living-together-without-marriage/#comment-1369</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know where to begin---this article suggests such a limited and superficial understanding of &quot;marriage&quot; that to fully respond would require volumes on the subject. As I have neither the time nor the inclination to engage in such an endeavor let me address the point which appears to be at the heart of your entire premise--that being that &quot;marriage is mostly a ritual and traditional act&quot; . While there are rituals and traditions attached to this age old institution, marriage is actually a &quot;union&quot;--specifically the union of the two people into a singly recognized unit. Put simply when one enters into marriage they are formally and publicly stating that they are ONE with the other person-- from that day forward what happens to one happens to both.They accept full and complete responsibility (social, financial, medical etc.) for the other. Based on this full measure of commitment--this complete union--historically couples who have entered into this union have been privy to certain limited legal privleges. Those are merely a by product of the union, not the union itself as you imply-- because MARRIAGE is a FULL commitment not simply a function of address change. There is no half measure, no trial period, no testing the pasta in smaller quantities.Compared to marriage, cohabitation is &quot;playing house&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know where to begin&#8212;this article suggests such a limited and superficial understanding of &#8220;marriage&#8221; that to fully respond would require volumes on the subject. As I have neither the time nor the inclination to engage in such an endeavor let me address the point which appears to be at the heart of your entire premise&#8211;that being that &#8220;marriage is mostly a ritual and traditional act&#8221; . While there are rituals and traditions attached to this age old institution, marriage is actually a &#8220;union&#8221;&#8211;specifically the union of the two people into a singly recognized unit. Put simply when one enters into marriage they are formally and publicly stating that they are ONE with the other person&#8211; from that day forward what happens to one happens to both.They accept full and complete responsibility (social, financial, medical etc.) for the other. Based on this full measure of commitment&#8211;this complete union&#8211;historically couples who have entered into this union have been privy to certain limited legal privleges. Those are merely a by product of the union, not the union itself as you imply&#8211; because MARRIAGE is a FULL commitment not simply a function of address change. There is no half measure, no trial period, no testing the pasta in smaller quantities.Compared to marriage, cohabitation is &#8220;playing house&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.329 seconds -->
